CESNUR's war on Mr Martinelli
I never had to do with Usenet groups; so
it was by chance that I learned that these mysterious cyberplaces were
being invaded by what amounted to over one hundred messages of personal
insults against me.
However, it had a bizarre conclusion, when
Introvigne told the world that these "inflatable doll" messages were part
of a "study" on Usenet groups. He claims he had a group of his followers
"answer anti-cult postings" on Usenet, in an anonymous "covert participation
observation programme."
Even taking this statement at face value,
there are some rather obvious ethical considerations.
By Introvigne's own admission, the study
was only decided in February; for one month, the CESNUR activists read
up furiously to find what Internet was. They then launched a three month
campaign of promotion of CESNUR and denigration of its adversaries, breaking
every known rule of Netiquette. Something like a bull doing research on
crockery sales in shops.
Introvigne then told the Internet community
that he had discovered what their world was all about: Netizens are terrorists
affected by information overload and "disinhibition." A conclusion he had
obviously already come to before starting the study, since the title decided
in February already spoke of "anti-cult terrorism." Shortly after, Introvigne
gave practical expression to what he thinks of freedom of speech on Internet
by suppressing our website.
Describing this "participant observation",
Introvigne speaks of "fierce flame wars" on "both sides." Actually, as
far as I know, the whole group of CESNUR activists posted their insults
for three months almost unopposed, except for some occasional replies by
Martinelli,
an Italian living in Brazil who has little to do with any "anti-cult movement."
The lack of opposition led the CESNUR people to invent a few offensive
false posts in my name, and several obscene personal insults against a
lady belonging to a Catholic cult-monitoring organisation, apparently in
an attempt to elicit a reaction which never came.
This "study" leads Introvigne to draw a
few "conclusions" about Usenet in general, rather than about his brave
but solitary opponent, Mr Martinelli; Martinelli is accused of looking
for "crucial documents", of suffering from "Internet disinhibition" and
of "escalating conflicts." I leave it to Martinelli, should he wish to
reply, to comment on this extraordinary outpouring of taxpayers' money
devoted to exploring his psyche.
|